Re: PostgreSQL Limits: maximum number of columns in SELECT result
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Dave Cramer <davecramer@postgres.rocks>, Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-05-31T18:15:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2022-May-31, Tom Lane wrote: > Detail is far from "free". Most readers are going to spend more time > wondering what the difference is between "columns per table" and "columns > per tuple", and which limit applies when, than they are going to save by > having the docs present them with two inconsistent numbers. I think it's reasonable to have two adjacent rows in the table for these two closely related things, but rather than "columns per tuple" I would label the second one "columns in a result set". This is easy enough to understand and to differentiate from the other limit. (Replacing "in a" with "per" sounds OK to me but less natural, not sure why.) -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "The Gord often wonders why people threaten never to come back after they've been told never to return" (www.actsofgord.com)
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: mention limitation of the number of resultset columns
- 9ae467db92ce 12.12 landed
- e6bd7aafc82d 13.8 landed
- f2a0060a9bfb 14.4 landed
- bbb6489042a8 15.0 landed