Re: postgres_fdw "parallel_commit" docs
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, etsuro.fujita@gmail.com
Date: 2022-05-09T15:58:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:37:35AM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > @@ -473,27 +473,25 @@ OPTIONS (ADD password_required 'false'); > <term><literal>parallel_commit</literal> (<type>boolean</type>)</term> > <listitem> > <para> > - This option controls whether <filename>postgres_fdw</filename> commits > - remote (sub)transactions opened on a foreign server in a local > - (sub)transaction in parallel when the local (sub)transaction commits. > - This option can only be specified for foreign servers, not per-table. > - The default is <literal>false</literal>. > + This option controls whether <filename>postgres_fdw</filename> commits in > + parallel remote transactions opened on a foreign server in a local > + transaction when the local transaction is committed. This setting > + applies to remote and local substransactions. This option can only be typo: substransactions > - If multiple foreign servers with this option enabled are involved in > - a local (sub)transaction, multiple remote (sub)transactions opened on > - those foreign servers in the local (sub)transaction are committed in > - parallel across those foreign servers when the local (sub)transaction > - commits. > + If multiple foreign servers with this option enabled have a local > + transaction, multiple remote transactions on those foreign servers are > + committed in parallel across those foreign servers when the local > + transaction is committed. > </para> I think "have a transaction" doesn't sound good, and the old language "involved in" was better.
Commits
-
Doc: Improve description of the "parallel_commit" option for postgres_fdw.
- 8c8d307f8297 15.0 landed