Horton

Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, 李杰(慎追) <adger.lj@alibaba-inc.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Date: 2022-04-14T20:37:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Thanks for the patch -- I have pushed it now, with some wording changes
and renaming the role to regress_* to avoid buildfarm's ire.

Michaël in addition proposes an isolation test.  I'm not sure; is it
worth the additional test run time?  It doesn't seem a critical issue.
But if anybody feels like contributing one, step right ahead.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

Commits

  1. Add some isolation tests for CLUSTER

  2. Have CLUSTER ignore partitions not owned by caller

  3. Remove "recheck" argument from check_index_is_clusterable()

  4. Allow CLUSTER on partitioned tables

  5. doc: Add backlinks to progress reporting documentation