Re: row filtering for logical replication
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On 2021-Dec-26, Euler Taveira wrote: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2021, at 1:20 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 11:04 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > So, IMO the PG docs wording for this part should be relaxed a bit. > > > > > > e.g. > > > BEFORE: > > > + A nullable column in the <literal>WHERE</literal> clause could cause the > > > + expression to evaluate to false; avoid using columns without not-null > > > + constraints in the <literal>WHERE</literal> clause. > > > AFTER: > > > + A nullable column in the <literal>WHERE</literal> clause could cause the > > > + expression to evaluate to false. To avoid unexpected results, any possible > > > + null values should be accounted for. Is this actually correct? I think a null value would cause the expression to evaluate to null, not false; the issue is that the filter considers a null value as not matching (right?). Maybe it's better to spell that out explicitly; both these wordings seem distracting. You have this elsewhere: + If the optional <literal>WHERE</literal> clause is specified, only rows + that satisfy the <replaceable class="parameter">expression</replaceable> + will be published. Note that parentheses are required around the + expression. It has no effect on <literal>TRUNCATE</literal> commands. Maybe this whole thing is clearer if you just say "If the optional WHERE clause is specified, rows for which the expression returns false or null will not be published." With that it should be fairly clear what happens if you have NULL values in the columns used in the expression, and you can just delete that phrase you're discussing. -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/