Re: pg_upgrade should truncate/remove its logs before running
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-12-15T21:12:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 04:09:16PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 08:50:17PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I have seen this numerous times but had not dug into it, until now. > > > > If pg_upgrade fails and is re-run, it appends to its logfiles, which is > > confusing since, if it fails again, it then looks like the original error > > recurred and wasn't fixed. The "append" behavior dates back to 717f6d608. > > > > I think it should either truncate the logfiles, or error early if any of the > > files exist. Or it could put all its output files into a newly-created > > subdirectory. Or this message could be output to the per-db logfiles, and not > > just the static ones: > > | "pg_upgrade run on %s". > > > > For the per-db logfiels with OIDs in their name, changing open() from "append" > > mode to truncate mode doesn't work, since they're written to in parallel. > > They have to be removed/truncated in advance. > > > > This is one possible fix. You can test its effect by deliberately breaking one > > of the calls to exec_progs(), like this. > > > > - "\"%s/pg_restore\" %s %s --exit-on-error --verbose " > > + "\"%s/pg_restore\" %s %s --exit-on-error --verboose " > > Uh, the database server doesn't erase its logs on crash/failure, so why > should pg_upgrade do that? To avoid the presence of irrelevant errors from the previous invocation of pg_upgrade. Maybe you would prefer one of my other ideas , like "put all its output files into a newly-created subdirectory" ? -- Justin
Commits
-
pg_upgrade: Move all the files generated internally to a subdirectory
- 38bfae365266 15.0 landed