Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-11-24T14:51:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Nov-24, Robert Haas wrote:

> Hmm. I think in my model an item and an item pointer and a line
> pointer are all the same thing, but a TID is different. When I talk
> about a TID, I mean the location of an item pointer, not its contents.
> So a TID is what tells me that I want block 5 and the 4th slot in the
> item pointer array. The item pointer tells me that the associate tuple
> is at a certain position in the page and has a certain length.

OK, but you can have item pointers that don't have any item.
LP_REDIRECT, LP_DEAD, LP_UNUSED item pointers don't have items.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera              Valdivia, Chile  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Nunca confiaré en un traidor.  Ni siquiera si el traidor lo he creado yo"
(Barón Vladimir Harkonnen)



Commits

  1. vacuumlazy.c: fix remaining "dead tuple" references.

  2. vacuumlazy.c: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items.

  3. Remove tupgone special case from vacuumlazy.c.

  4. Standardize ItemIdData terminology.