Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-11-22T16:25:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Oct-28, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > Thanks all for reviewing this. Here's the CF entry - > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/35/3378/ Thanks, pushed. I changed a couple of things though -- notably changed the elog() to ereport() as suggested by Nathan early on, but never materialized in the submitted patch. I also changed the wording of the context names, since the proposed ones weren't much more satisfactory than the existing ones. -- Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Every machine is a smoke machine if you operate it wrong enough." https://twitter.com/libseybieda/status/1541673325781196801
Commits
-
autovacuum: Improve wording in a couple places
- 042412879e35 15.0 landed