Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Gilles Darold <gilles@darold.net>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-11-15T20:23:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow underscores in integer and numeric constants.
- faff8f8e47f1 16.0 cited
-
Remove special outfuncs/readfuncs handling of RangeVar.catalogname.
- 3cece34be842 16.0 cited
-
Remove extra space from dumped ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.
- 2af33369e794 16.0 cited
-
Create FKs properly when attaching table as partition
- b0284bfb1db5 16.0 cited
-
psql: improve tab-complete's handling of variant SQL names.
- 02b8048ba5dc 15.0 cited
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:00:13PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Thank you for review and fixes, I try to complete some version for next > work, and looks so your patch 0001 is broken > > gedit reports to me broken unicode \A0\A0\A0\A0\A0 > > my last patch has 276KB and your patch has 293KB? On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:06:08PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > my last patch has 276KB and your patch has 293KB? > > Please, can you resend your version of patch 0001? https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20211106013904.GG17618@telsasoft.com 0001 is exactly your patch applied to HEAD, and 0002 are Tomas' changes relative to your patch. 0003 is my contribution on top. My intent is that you wouldn't apply 0001, but rather apply my 0003 on top of your existing branch, and then review 0002/0003, and then squish the changes into your patch. I see the 0xa0 stuff in your original patch before my changes, but I'm not sure what went wrong. Let me know if you have any issue applying my changes on top of your existing, local branch ? -- Justin