Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-11-08T17:45:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Nov-08, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org) wrote: > > That said, if the list is short, then additional predefined roles seem > > preferrable to having a ton of infrastructure code that might be much > > more clutter than what seems a short list of additional predefined roles. > > None of this strikes me as a 'ton of infrastructure code' and so I'm not > quite sure I'm following the argument being made here. I was referring specifically to Andres' idea of having additional DDL commands handled as special GRANTable privileges, https://postgr.es/m/20211104224636.5qg6cfyjkw52rh4d@alap3.anarazel.de -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Hay quien adquiere la mala costumbre de ser infeliz" (M. A. Evans)
Commits
-
Add pg_checkpointer predefined role for CHECKPOINT command.
- 4168a4745492 15.0 landed