Re: [CLOBBER_CACHE]Server crashed with segfault 11 while executing clusterdb
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
To: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: sulamul@gmail.com, michael@paquier.xyz, noah@leadboat.com,
neha.sharma@enterprisedb.com, amitlangote09@gmail.com,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2021-03-25T06:40:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Sorry for the bug.
At Thu, 25 Mar 2021 01:50:29 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in
> Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:09 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> static inline struct SMgrRelationData *
> >> RelationGetSmgr(Relation rel)
> >> {
> >> if (unlikely(rel->rd_smgr == NULL))
> >> RelationOpenSmgr(rel);
> >> return rel->rd_smgr;
> >> }
>
> > A quick question: Can't it be a macro instead of an inline function
> > like other macros we have in rel.h?
>
> The multiple-evaluation hazard seems like an issue. We've tolerated
> such hazards in the past, but mostly just because we weren't relying
> on static inlines being available, so there wasn't a good way around
> it.
>
> Also, the conditional evaluation here would look rather ugly
> in a macro, I think, if indeed you could do it at all without
> provoking compiler warnings.
FWIW, +1 for the function as is.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
Commits
-
Replace RelationOpenSmgr() with RelationGetSmgr().
- e21856fd652a 12.14 landed
- d4acf2eb94f3 11.19 landed
- 9a299cf7c21f 13.10 landed
- 32d5a4974c81 14.7 landed
- f10f0ae420ee 15.0 landed
-
Avoid possible crash while finishing up a heap rewrite.
- d4791ac35cb1 13.3 landed
- 9d523119fd38 14.0 landed
-
Redefine pg_class.reltuples to be -1 before the first VACUUM or ANALYZE.
- 3d351d916b20 14.0 cited