Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-01-27T17:09:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,
On 2021-01-27 19:05:16 +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> /*
> + * LogBackTrace
> + *
> + * Get the backtrace and log the backtrace to log file.
> + */
> +void
> +LogBackTrace(void)
> +{
> + int save_errno = errno;
> +
> + void *buf[100];
> + int nframes;
> + char **strfrms;
> + StringInfoData errtrace;
> +
> + /* OK to process messages. Reset the flag saying there are more to do. */
> + PrintBacktracePending = false;
ISTM that it'd be better to do this in the caller, allowing this
function to be used outside of signal triggered backtraces.
>
> +extern void LogBackTrace(void); /* Called from EmitProcSignalPrintCallStack */
I don't think this comment is correct anymore?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Commits
-
Perform apply of large transactions by parallel workers.
- 216a784829c2 16.0 cited
-
Enhance pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() for auxiliary processes.
- 790fbda90209 15.0 cited
-
Allow GRANT on pg_log_backend_memory_contexts().
- f0b051e322d5 15.0 cited
-
Move Perl test modules to a better namespace
- b3b4d8e68ae8 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Add backtrace support for error reporting
- 71a8a4f6e365 13.0 cited