Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation

Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>

To: tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com

Cc: osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com, sfrost@snowman.net, masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org

Date: 2021-01-08T08:52:21Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

pg_dump: Refactor getIndexes()
- e2c52beecdea 15.0 cited
Optimize DropRelFileNodesAllBuffers() for recovery.
- bea449c635c0 14.0 cited

At Fri, 08 Jan 2021 14:47:05 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in 
> This version RelationChangePersistence() is changed not to choose
> in-place method for indexes other than btree. It seems to be usable
> with all kind of indexes other than Gist, but at the mement it applies
> only to btrees.
> 
> 1: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZEZ5RONS49C7mEpjhjndqMQtVrz_LCQUkpRWdmRevDnQ@mail.gmail.com

Hmm. This is not wroking correctly. I'll repost after fixint that.

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center