Thread
Commits
-
Reference test binary using TESTDIR in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl.
- 0baa33da0fd1 14.1 landed
- 795862c280c5 15.0 landed
-
PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2021-09-30T21:40:40Z
Hi, For me 001_libpq_pipeline.pl doesn't reliably work on windows, because it tries to add something to PATH, using unix syntax (vs ; used on windows). $ENV{PATH} = "$ENV{TESTDIR}:$ENV{PATH}"; If the first two elements in PATH are something needed, this can cause the test to fail... I'm surprised this doesn't cause problems on the buildfarm - a plain perl src\tools\msvc\vcregress.pl taptest src\test\modules\libpq_pipeline\ fails for me. Greetings, Andres Freund -
Re: PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2021-10-01T18:07:42Z
On 9/30/21 5:40 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > For me 001_libpq_pipeline.pl doesn't reliably work on windows, because it > tries to add something to PATH, using unix syntax (vs ; used on windows). > > $ENV{PATH} = "$ENV{TESTDIR}:$ENV{PATH}"; > > If the first two elements in PATH are something needed, this can cause the > test to fail... I'm surprised this doesn't cause problems on the buildfarm - a > plain > perl src\tools\msvc\vcregress.pl taptest src\test\modules\libpq_pipeline\ > fails for me. Not sure. That's certainly an error. But why are we mangling the PATH at all? Wouldn't it be better just to call command_ok with "$ENV{TESTDIR}/libpg_pipeline" ? cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com -
Re: PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2021-10-01T20:25:36Z
Hi, On 2021-10-01 14:07:42 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > But why are we mangling the PATH at all? Wouldn't it be better just to > call command_ok with "$ENV{TESTDIR}/libpg_pipeline" ? Yea, it probably would. Alvaro, I assume you don't mind if I change that? Greetings, Andres Freund -
Re: PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> — 2021-10-01T20:37:11Z
On 2021-Oct-01, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2021-10-01 14:07:42 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > But why are we mangling the PATH at all? Wouldn't it be better just to > > call command_ok with "$ENV{TESTDIR}/libpg_pipeline" ? > > Yea, it probably would. Alvaro, I assume you don't mind if I change that? Hi, no, please go ahead. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "En las profundidades de nuestro inconsciente hay una obsesiva necesidad de un universo lógico y coherente. Pero el universo real se halla siempre un paso más allá de la lógica" (Irulan) -
Re: PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2021-10-01T23:02:27Z
On 2021-10-01 17:37:11 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2021-Oct-01, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2021-10-01 14:07:42 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > But why are we mangling the PATH at all? Wouldn't it be better just to > > > call command_ok with "$ENV{TESTDIR}/libpg_pipeline" ? > > > > Yea, it probably would. Alvaro, I assume you don't mind if I change that? > > Hi, no, please go ahead. Done.