Thread

Commits

  1. Reference test binary using TESTDIR in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl.

  1. PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2021-09-30T21:40:40Z

    Hi,
    
    For me 001_libpq_pipeline.pl doesn't reliably work on windows, because it
    tries to add something to PATH, using unix syntax (vs ; used on windows).
    
    $ENV{PATH} = "$ENV{TESTDIR}:$ENV{PATH}";
    
    If the first two elements in PATH are something needed, this can cause the
    test to fail... I'm surprised this doesn't cause problems on the buildfarm - a
    plain
      perl src\tools\msvc\vcregress.pl taptest src\test\modules\libpq_pipeline\
    fails for me.
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2021-10-01T18:07:42Z

    On 9/30/21 5:40 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > For me 001_libpq_pipeline.pl doesn't reliably work on windows, because it
    > tries to add something to PATH, using unix syntax (vs ; used on windows).
    >
    > $ENV{PATH} = "$ENV{TESTDIR}:$ENV{PATH}";
    >
    > If the first two elements in PATH are something needed, this can cause the
    > test to fail... I'm surprised this doesn't cause problems on the buildfarm - a
    > plain
    >   perl src\tools\msvc\vcregress.pl taptest src\test\modules\libpq_pipeline\
    > fails for me.
    
    
    Not sure. That's certainly an error.
    
    
    But why are we mangling the PATH at all? Wouldn't it be better just to
    call command_ok with "$ENV{TESTDIR}/libpg_pipeline" ?
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    --
    Andrew Dunstan
    EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2021-10-01T20:25:36Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2021-10-01 14:07:42 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > But why are we mangling the PATH at all? Wouldn't it be better just to
    > call command_ok with "$ENV{TESTDIR}/libpg_pipeline" ?
    
    Yea, it probably would. Alvaro, I assume you don't mind if I change that?
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  4. Re: PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> — 2021-10-01T20:37:11Z

    On 2021-Oct-01, Andres Freund wrote:
    
    > Hi,
    > 
    > On 2021-10-01 14:07:42 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > But why are we mangling the PATH at all? Wouldn't it be better just to
    > > call command_ok with "$ENV{TESTDIR}/libpg_pipeline" ?
    > 
    > Yea, it probably would. Alvaro, I assume you don't mind if I change that?
    
    Hi, no, please go ahead.
    
    -- 
    Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
    "En las profundidades de nuestro inconsciente hay una obsesiva necesidad
    de un universo lógico y coherente. Pero el universo real se halla siempre
    un paso más allá de la lógica" (Irulan)
    
    
    
    
  5. Re: PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2021-10-01T23:02:27Z

    On 2021-10-01 17:37:11 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
    > On 2021-Oct-01, Andres Freund wrote:
    > > On 2021-10-01 14:07:42 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > > But why are we mangling the PATH at all? Wouldn't it be better just to
    > > > call command_ok with "$ENV{TESTDIR}/libpg_pipeline" ?
    > > 
    > > Yea, it probably would. Alvaro, I assume you don't mind if I change that?
    > 
    > Hi, no, please go ahead.
    
    Done.