Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Date: 2021-08-28T20:03:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Aug-17, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I suggest the attached (which partially reverts the revert), to allow showing > correct data for analyze_count and last_analyzed. Yeah, that makes sense and my keeping of the pg_stat_all_tables entries seems pretty useless without this change. I have pushed a slightly modified version of this to 14 and master. > Arguably these should be reported as null in v14 for partitioned tables, since > they're not "known to be zero", but rather "currently unpopulated". > > n_mod_since_analyze | 0 > n_ins_since_vacuum | 0 I don't disagree, but it's not easy to implement this at present. I think almost all counters should be nulls for partitioned tables. For some of them one could make a case that it'd be more convenient to propagate numbers up from partitions. -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Commits
-
Keep stats up to date for partitioned tables
- e1efc5b465c8 14.0 landed
- 375aed36ad83 15.0 landed
-
Revert analyze support for partitioned tables
- b3d24cc0f0aa 14.0 landed
- 6f8127b73901 15.0 landed
-
Document ANALYZE storage parameters for partitioned tables
- 41badeaba8be 14.0 landed
-
autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables
- 0827e8af70f4 14.0 landed