Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2021-08-13T15:30:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2021-08-13 11:09:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> writes: > > Tested against PostgreSQL 13.3 on a physical rv64gc system (BeagleV > > Starlight beta board) - builds and installs fine, all tests pass. Seems like a good idea to me. > Cool ... I had hoped to acquire one of those myself, but I didn't > make the cut. Should we backpatch this? It's not like we're going to break existing risc-v systems by enabling spinlock support... Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
Add RISC-V spinlock support in s_lock.h.
- 4ffbd55d9346 14.0 landed
- c32fcac56a21 15.0 landed
- 582a2affa4a9 9.6.24 landed
- 7915a9515cfb 10.19 landed
- 8024ff478ba7 11.14 landed
- cdda2b247dd5 12.9 landed
- 48695decc271 13.5 landed