Re: unnesting multirange data types
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-07-15T15:29:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Jun-19, Tom Lane wrote: > Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes: > > I also don't feel comfortable hurrying with unnest part to beta2. > > According to the open items wiki page, there should be beta3. Does > > unnest part have a chance for beta3? > > Hm. I'd prefer to avoid another forced initdb after beta2. On the > other hand, it's entirely likely that there will be some other thing > that forces that; in which case there'd be no reason not to push in > the unnest feature as well. > > I'd say let's sit on the unnest code for a little bit and see what > happens. ... So, almost a month has gone by, and we still don't have multirange unnest(). Looking at the open items list, it doesn't look like we have anything that would require a catversion bump. Does that mean that we're going to ship pg14 without multirange unnest? That seems pretty sad, as the usability of the feature is greatly reduced. Just look at what's being suggested: https://postgr.es/m/20210715121508.GA30348@depesz.com To me this screams of an incomplete datatype. I far prefer a beta3 initdb than shipping 14GA without multirange unnest. I haven't seen any announcements about beta3, but it's probably not far off; I think if we're going to have it, it would be much better to give it buildfarm cycles several days in advance and not just the last weekend. What do others think? -- Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Ninguna manada de bestias tiene una voz tan horrible como la humana" (Orual)
Commits
-
Fix small inconsistencies in catalog definition of multirange operators
- 4d39d4e639b4 14.0 landed
- 768ea9bcf981 15.0 landed
-
Revert 29854ee8d1 due to buildfarm failures
- 817bb0a7d1e0 14.0 landed
-
Copy-edit text for the pg_terminate_backend() "timeout" parameter.
- 0aac73e6a260 14.0 cited
-
Add missing pg_description strings for pg_type entries.
- b09a64d602a1 12.0 cited
-
Fix pg_description entries for jsonb_to_record() and jsonb_to_recordset().
- a4627e8fd479 9.6.0 cited
-
docs: clarify JSONB operator descriptions
- b852dc4cbd09 9.6.0 cited
-
Set procost to 10 for each of the pg_foo_is_visible() functions.
- a80889a7359e 9.3.0 cited
-
Make use of LATERAL in information_schema.sequences view.
- c246eb5aafe6 9.3.0 cited
-
Add pg_trigger_depth() function
- 74ab96a45ef6 9.2.0 cited
-
Add database comments to template0 and postgres databases, and improve
- ddd6ff289f25 9.1.0 cited