Horton

Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-06-19T04:49:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:24:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:24:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Maybe "if true, pstmt's node tree must not be modified" ?
> 
> > Thanks, I find it way better!
> 
> OK, pushed that way, and with a couple other comment tweaks from
> an additional re-reading.

Thanks!  For the record I already pushed the required compatibility changes for
hypopg extension.

Commits

  1. Avoid scribbling on input node tree in CREATE/ALTER DOMAIN.

  2. Centralize the logic for protective copying of utility statements.