Re: unnesting multirange data types

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-06-15T17:28:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Jun-15, Tom Lane wrote:

> It looks to me like the proximate problem is that you should
> have taught pg_dump to skip these new auto-generated functions.
> However, I fail to see why we need auto-generated functions
> for this at all.  Couldn't we have done it with one polymorphic
> function?

I think such a function would need to take anycompatiblerangearray,
which is not something we currently have.

> I think this ought to be reverted and reviewed more carefully.

It seems to me that removing the cast-to-range[] is a sufficient fix,
and that we can do with only the unnest part for pg14; the casts can be
added in 15 (if at all).  That would mean reverting only half the patch.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                            39°49'30"S 73°17'W



Commits

  1. Fix small inconsistencies in catalog definition of multirange operators

  2. Revert 29854ee8d1 due to buildfarm failures

  3. Copy-edit text for the pg_terminate_backend() "timeout" parameter.

  4. Add missing pg_description strings for pg_type entries.

  5. Fix pg_description entries for jsonb_to_record() and jsonb_to_recordset().

  6. docs: clarify JSONB operator descriptions

  7. Set procost to 10 for each of the pg_foo_is_visible() functions.

  8. Make use of LATERAL in information_schema.sequences view.

  9. Add pg_trigger_depth() function

  10. Add database comments to template0 and postgres databases, and improve