Re: unnesting multirange data types

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-06-09T20:56:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Jun-09, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:

> I did a couple more tests around this.
> 
> As suspected, in PL/pgSQL, there is no way to unpack or iterate over a
> multirange type.

Uh.  This is disappointing; the need for some way to unnest or unpack a
multirange was mentioned multiple times in the range_agg thread.  I had
assumed that there was some way to cast the multirange to a range array,
or somehow convert it, but apparently that doesn't work.

If the supporting pieces are mostly there, then I opine we should add
something.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                            39°49'30"S 73°17'W
"Hay dos momentos en la vida de un hombre en los que no debería
especular: cuando puede permitírselo y cuando no puede" (Mark Twain)



Commits

  1. Fix small inconsistencies in catalog definition of multirange operators

  2. Revert 29854ee8d1 due to buildfarm failures

  3. Copy-edit text for the pg_terminate_backend() "timeout" parameter.

  4. Add missing pg_description strings for pg_type entries.

  5. Fix pg_description entries for jsonb_to_record() and jsonb_to_recordset().

  6. docs: clarify JSONB operator descriptions

  7. Set procost to 10 for each of the pg_foo_is_visible() functions.

  8. Make use of LATERAL in information_schema.sequences view.

  9. Add pg_trigger_depth() function

  10. Add database comments to template0 and postgres databases, and improve