Re: SQL-standard function body
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2021-05-11T07:49:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:09:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > On 27.04.21 18:16, Tom Lane wrote: > >> That's kind of a lot of complication, and inefficiency, for a corner case > >> that may never arise in practice. We've ignored the risk for default > >> expressions, and AFAIR have yet to receive any field complaints about it. > >> So maybe it's okay to do the same for SQL-style function bodies, at least > >> for now. > > >>> Another option would be that we disallow this at creation time. > > >> Don't like that one much. The backend shouldn't be in the business > >> of rejecting valid commands just because pg_dump might be unable > >> to cope later. > > > Since this is listed as an open item, I want to clarify that I'm > > currently not planning to work on this, based on this discussion. > > Certainly something to look into sometime later, but it's not in my > > plans right now. > > Right, I concur with moving it to the "won't fix" category. Works for me.
Commits
-
Don't crash on empty statements in SQL-standard function bodies.
- bfeede9fa464 14.0 landed
-
psql: Fix line continuation prompts for unbalanced parentheses
- d9a9f4b4b92a 14.0 landed
-
Provide query source text when parsing a SQL-standard function body.
- 409723365b27 14.0 landed
-
Revert "Cope with NULL query string in ExecInitParallelPlan()."
- 83efce7a1ebc 14.0 landed
-
Undo decision to allow pg_proc.prosrc to be NULL.
- 1111b2668d89 14.0 landed
-
SQL-standard function body
- e717a9a18b2e 14.0 landed
-
Move pg_stat_statements query jumbling to core.
- 5fd9dfa5f50e 14.0 cited
-
Extend SQL function tests lightly
- 11b80d900fe4 14.0 landed