Re: Stale description for pg_basebackup
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
To: masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-04-22T04:25:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:06:50 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in > Either works for me. I didn't add "()" because I just used the same > description > as that in func.sgml. > > it may be useful to run <function>pg_switch_wal</function> on the > primary in order to trigger an immediate segment switch.) .. > IMO "in order to..." part is helpful for us to understand why > pg_switch_wal > is useful in this case. So I'd like to leave it. Ok, I'm fine with both of them. Thanks for the explanation. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
Commits
-
doc: Fix obsolete description about pg_basebackup.
- d59964999d15 10.17 landed
- 50b84aa26239 11.12 landed
- 0ecc88076ed2 12.7 landed
- 8019fcb00f88 13.3 landed
- eaec48b3c54e 14.0 landed
-
Make pg_stop_backup's wait_for_archive flag work on standbys.
- 52f8a59dd953 10.0 cited