Horton

Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>, legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-04-08T14:54:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 03:18:09PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:04 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If yes, PFA a patch to merge 1.10 in 1.9.
> 
> I actually thought I looked at that, but clearly I was confused one
> way or another.
> 
> I think you're right, it's cleaner to merge it into 1.9, so applied and pushed.

Thanks Magnus!

Commits

  1. Merge v1.10 of pg_stat_statements into v1.9

  2. Track identical top vs nested queries independently in pg_stat_statements