Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Luc Vlaming <luc@swarm64.com>, Paul Guo <guopa@vmware.com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Date: 2020-12-25T02:40:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
libpq: Fix some issues in TAP tests for service files
- 2c7bd2ba507e 18.0 cited
-
Multiple revisions to the GROUP BY reordering tests
- 874d817baa16 17.0 cited
-
Explore alternative orderings of group-by pathkeys during optimization.
- 0452b461bc40 17.0 cited
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 05:48:42AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > I'm not posting the updated 0002 to 0004 patches, I plan to do so > after a couple of reviews happen on the design of the APIs in 0001. > > Thoughts? Are you familiar with this work ? https://commitfest.postgresql.org/31/2717/ Reloptions for table access methods It seems like that can be relevant for your patch, and I think some of what your patch needs might be provided by AM opts. It's difficult to generalize AMs when we have only one, but your use-case might be a concrete example which would help to answer some questions on the other thread. @Jeff: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/31/2871/ -- Justin