Re: Add docs stub for recovery.conf
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-12-02T19:47:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greetings, * David G. Johnston (david.g.johnston@gmail.com) wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:42 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > The downside is you end up with X-1 dummy sections just to allow for > > references to old syntax, and you then have to find them all and remove > > them when you implement the proper solution. I have no intention of > > applying such an X-1 fix. > > X = 2; seems like a strong objection for such a minor issue. The status > quo seems worse than that. I've been thinking about this and I think I'm on Craig and David's side- having something cleaner, and clearer, than just http redirects and such would be good for these cases and I don't think we are going to end up with so many of them that it ends up becoming an issue. Thanks, Stephen
Commits
-
Add a docs section for obsoleted and renamed functions and settings
- 3b0c647bbfc5 14.0 landed
- 89e383b30a94 13.3 landed
- 448e86c3345b 12.7 landed
- 625f5aae7e42 11.12 landed
- 58960fca4ef1 10.17 landed