Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-11-23T15:06:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- arraylen.patch (text/x-diff) patch
On 2020-Nov-17, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Adding the expected length to the error message might be OK though. > > > Certainly seems like we should do at least that much. The current > > message is just wrong, right? > > It's incomplete, for sure. Doesn't mention nulls either. So let's go with this one.
Commits
-
Make some sanity-check elogs more verbose
- fe051291550a 14.0 landed