Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, "Inoue, Hiroshi" <h-inoue@dream.email.ne.jp>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi@winpg.jp>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: 2020-11-22T02:09:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 01:13:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Considering that we're preserving this only for backwards compatibility, > I doubt that changing the signature is a good idea. It maybe risks > breaking something, and the ODBC driver is hardly going to notice > any improved ease-of-use. So, what you are basically saying is to switch currtid_byreloid() to become a function local to tid.c. And then have just currtid_byrelname() and currtid_for_view() call that, right? -- Michael
Commits
-
Remove catalog function currtid()
- 7b94e999606e 14.0 landed