Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Hi,
I'm still fighting with snapshot_too_old. The feature is just badly
undertested, underdocumented, and there's lots of other oddities. I've
now spent about as much time on that feature than on the whole rest of
the patchset.
As an example for under-documented, here's a definitely non-trivial
block of code without a single comment explaining what it's doing.
if (oldSnapshotControl->count_used > 0 &&
ts >= oldSnapshotControl->head_timestamp)
{
int offset;
offset = ((ts - oldSnapshotControl->head_timestamp)
/ USECS_PER_MINUTE);
if (offset > oldSnapshotControl->count_used - 1)
offset = oldSnapshotControl->count_used - 1;
offset = (oldSnapshotControl->head_offset + offset)
% OLD_SNAPSHOT_TIME_MAP_ENTRIES;
xlimit = oldSnapshotControl->xid_by_minute[offset];
if (NormalTransactionIdFollows(xlimit, recentXmin))
SetOldSnapshotThresholdTimestamp(ts, xlimit);
}
LWLockRelease(OldSnapshotTimeMapLock);
Also, SetOldSnapshotThresholdTimestamp() acquires a separate spinlock -
not great to call that with the lwlock held.
Then there's this comment:
/*
* Failsafe protection against vacuuming work of active transaction.
*
* This is not an assertion because we avoid the spinlock for
* performance, leaving open the possibility that xlimit could advance
* and be more current; but it seems prudent to apply this limit. It
* might make pruning a tiny bit less aggressive than it could be, but
* protects against data loss bugs.
*/
if (TransactionIdIsNormal(latest_xmin)
&& TransactionIdPrecedes(latest_xmin, xlimit))
xlimit = latest_xmin;
if (NormalTransactionIdFollows(xlimit, recentXmin))
return xlimit;
So this is not using lock, so the values aren't accurate, but it avoids
data loss bugs? I also don't know which spinlock is avoided on the path
here as mentioend - the acquisition is unconditional.
But more importantly - if this is about avoiding data loss bugs, how on
earth is it ok that we don't go through these checks in the
old_snapshot_threshold == 0 path?
/*
* Zero threshold always overrides to latest xmin, if valid. Without
* some heuristic it will find its own snapshot too old on, for
* example, a simple UPDATE -- which would make it useless for most
* testing, but there is no principled way to ensure that it doesn't
* fail in this way. Use a five-second delay to try to get useful
* testing behavior, but this may need adjustment.
*/
if (old_snapshot_threshold == 0)
{
if (TransactionIdPrecedes(latest_xmin, MyProc->xmin)
&& TransactionIdFollows(latest_xmin, xlimit))
xlimit = latest_xmin;
ts -= 5 * USECS_PER_SEC;
SetOldSnapshotThresholdTimestamp(ts, xlimit);
return xlimit;
}
This feature looks like it was put together by applying force until
something gave, and then stopping just there.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Commits
-
Try to unbreak 021_row_visibility.pl on mingw.
- 1df2b50dbebb 14.0 landed
-
Fix and test snapshot behavior on standby.
- 7b28913bcab8 14.0 landed
-
Fix race condition in snapshot caching when 2PC is used.
- 07f32fcd23ac 14.0 cited
-
snapshot scalability: cache snapshots using a xact completion counter.
- 623a9ba79bbd 14.0 landed
-
Fix use of wrong index in ComputeXidHorizons().
- f6661d3df228 14.0 landed
-
Make vacuum a bit more verbose to debug BF failure.
- 49967da65aec 14.0 landed
-
snapshot scalability: Introduce dense array of in-progress xids.
- 941697c3c1ae 14.0 landed
-
snapshot scalability: Move PGXACT->vacuumFlags to ProcGlobal->vacuumFlags.
- 5788e258bb26 14.0 landed
-
snapshot scalability: Move subxact info to ProcGlobal, remove PGXACT.
- 73487a60fc10 14.0 landed
-
snapshot scalability: Move PGXACT->xmin back to PGPROC.
- 1f51c17c68d0 14.0 landed
-
snapshot scalability: Don't compute global horizons while building snapshots.
- dc7420c2c927 14.0 landed
-
BRIN: Handle concurrent desummarization properly
- 1f42d35a1d61 14.0 cited
-
Track latest completed xid as a FullTransactionId.
- 3bd7f9969a24 14.0 landed
-
Rename VariableCacheData.nextFullXid to nextXid.
- fea10a64340e 14.0 landed
-
snapshot scalability: Move delayChkpt from PGXACT to PGPROC.
- 75848bc74411 13.0 landed
-
Report progress of CREATE INDEX operations
- ab0dfc961b6a 12.0 cited