Horton

Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>, Alexey Kondratov <a.kondratov@postgrespro.ru>, Liudmila Mantrova <l.mantrova@postgrespro.ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, vladimirlesk@yandex-team.ru, dsarafan@yandex-team.ru
Date: 2020-03-30T01:56:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Move frontend-side archive APIs from src/common/ to src/fe_utils/

  2. Add -c/--restore-target-wal to pg_rewind

  3. Move routine definitions of xlogarchive.c to a new header file

  4. Move routine building restore_command to src/common/

  5. Integrate recovery.conf into postgresql.conf

Attachments

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:47:29AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 06:56:36PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I don't think any such cleanup should hamper the patch at hand anyway.
> 
> I don't think either, so I would do the split for the archive routines
> at least.  It still feels strange to me to have a different routine
> name for the frontend-side of RestoreArchivedFile().  That's not
> really consistent with the current practice we have palloc() & co, as
> well as the sync routines.

Okay.  Hearing nothing, I have rebased the patch set this morning,
improving some comments and the code format while on it.  I would like
to commit both 0001 (creation of xlogarchiver.h) and 0002 attached in
the next couple of days.  If you have an objection, please feel free.
--
Michael