Re: backup manifests
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Try to avoid compiler warnings in optimized builds.
- 05021a2c0cd2 13.0 landed
-
Fix option related issues in pg_verifybackup.
- 0a89e93bfaa6 13.0 landed
-
Add index term for backup manifest in documentation.
- 4db819ba4039 13.0 landed
-
Code review for backup manifest.
- a2ac73e7be7a 13.0 landed
-
Document the backup manifest file format.
- 149f2ae88ab0 13.0 landed
-
Fix typo in pg_validatebackup documentation.
- c4f82a779d26 13.0 landed
-
Exclude backup_manifest file that existed in database, from BASE_BACKUP.
- 1ec50a81ec0a 13.0 landed
-
Msys2 tweaks for pg_validatebackup corruption test
- c3e4cbaab936 13.0 landed
-
Fix resource management bug with replication=database.
- 3e0d80fd8d3d 13.0 cited
-
Be more careful about time_t vs. pg_time_t in basebackup.c.
- db1531cae009 13.0 cited
-
pg_validatebackup: Fix 'make clean' to remove tmp_check.
- 9f8f881caa0f 13.0 landed
-
pg_validatebackup: Also use perl2host in TAP tests.
- 460314db08e8 13.0 landed
-
Generate backup manifests for base backups, and validate them.
- 0d8c9c1210c4 13.0 landed
-
Add checksum helper functions.
- c12e43a2e0d4 13.0 landed
-
pg_waldump: Add a --quiet option.
- ac44367efbef 13.0 landed
-
Catversion bump for b9b408c48724
- afb5465e0cfc 13.0 cited
-
pg_basebackup: Refactor code for reading COPY and tar data.
- 431ba7bebf13 13.0 landed
-
Use a ResourceOwner to track buffer pins in all cases.
- 3cb646264e8c 12.0 cited
-
Use ARMv8 CRC instructions where available.
- f044d71e331d 11.0 cited
-
Logical replication support for initial data copy
- 7c4f52409a8c 10.0 cited
-
Use Intel SSE 4.2 CRC instructions where available.
- 3dc2d62d0486 9.5.0 cited
-
Switch to CRC-32C in WAL and other places.
- 5028f22f6eb0 9.5.0 cited
-
Remove support for 64-bit CRC.
- 404bc51cde9d 9.5.0 cited
-
Change CRCs in WAL records from 64bit to 32bit for performance reasons.
- 21fda22ec46d 8.1.0 cited
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:38:33PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > Greetings, > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 18:36 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:34:52PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > > > This is where I feel like I'm trying to make decisions in a vacuum. If > > > we had a few more people weighing in on the thread on this point, I'd > > > be happy to go with whatever the consensus was. If most people think > > > having both --no-manifest (suppressing the manifest completely) and > > > --manifest-checksums=none (suppressing only the checksums) is useless > > > and confusing, then sure, let's rip the latter one out. If most people > > > like the flexibility, let's keep it: it's already implemented and > > > tested. But I hate to base the decision on what one or two people > > > think. > > > > I'm frustrated at the lack of involvement from others also. > > Well, the topic of backup manifests feels like it has generated a lot of > bickering emails, and people don't want to spend their time dealing with > that. > > > I’d like to not also. I suppose it’s just an area that I’m particularly > concerned with that allows me to overcome that. Backups are important to me. The big question is whether the discussion _needs_ to be that way. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +