Re: backup manifests

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Suraj Kharage <suraj.kharage@enterprisedb.com>, tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>, Tels <nospam-pg-abuse@bloodgate.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-03-27T05:31:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Try to avoid compiler warnings in optimized builds.

  2. Fix option related issues in pg_verifybackup.

  3. Add index term for backup manifest in documentation.

  4. Code review for backup manifest.

  5. Document the backup manifest file format.

  6. Fix typo in pg_validatebackup documentation.

  7. Exclude backup_manifest file that existed in database, from BASE_BACKUP.

  8. Msys2 tweaks for pg_validatebackup corruption test

  9. Fix resource management bug with replication=database.

  10. Be more careful about time_t vs. pg_time_t in basebackup.c.

  11. pg_validatebackup: Fix 'make clean' to remove tmp_check.

  12. pg_validatebackup: Also use perl2host in TAP tests.

  13. Generate backup manifests for base backups, and validate them.

  14. Add checksum helper functions.

  15. pg_waldump: Add a --quiet option.

  16. Catversion bump for b9b408c48724

  17. pg_basebackup: Refactor code for reading COPY and tar data.

  18. Use a ResourceOwner to track buffer pins in all cases.

  19. Use ARMv8 CRC instructions where available.

  20. Logical replication support for initial data copy

  21. Use Intel SSE 4.2 CRC instructions where available.

  22. Switch to CRC-32C in WAL and other places.

  23. Remove support for 64-bit CRC.

  24. Change CRCs in WAL records from 64bit to 32bit for performance reasons.

Hi,

On 2020-03-26 15:37:11 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> The argument is that adding checksums takes more time.  I can understand
> that argument, though I don't really agree with it.  Certainly a few
> percent really shouldn't be that big of an issue, and in many cases even
> a sha256 hash isn't going to have that dramatic of an impact on the
> actual overall time.

I don't understand how you can come to that conclusion?  It doesn't take
very long to measure openssl's sha256 performance (which is pretty well
optimized). Note that we do use openssl's sha256, when compiled with
openssl support.

On my workstation, with a pretty new (but not fastest single core perf
model) intel Xeon Gold 5215, I get:

$ openssl speed sha256
...
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
sha256           76711.75k   172036.78k   321566.89k   399008.09k   431423.49k   433689.94k

IOW, ~430MB/s.


On my laptop, with pretty fast cores:
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
sha256           97054.91k   217188.63k   394864.13k   493441.02k   532100.44k   533441.19k

IOW, 530MB/s


530 MB/s is well within the realm of medium sized VMs.

And, as mentioned before. even if you do only half of that, you're still
going to be spending roughly half of the CPU time of sending a base
backup.

What makes you think that a few hundred MB/s is out of reach for a large
fraction of PG installations that actually keep backups?

Greetings,

Andres Freund