Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-03-25T19:51:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2020-03-25 15:24:44 -0400, James Coleman wrote: > Andres: If we got this fixed in current PG would you be opposed to > documenting the caveat in previous versions? Not really. I'm just not confident it's going to be useful, given the amount of details needed to be provided to really make sense of the issue (the earlier CIC phases don't wait for snapshots, but just relation locks etc). Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
Call out vacuum considerations in create index docs
- c285a244f6d3 13.2 landed
- 93c39f987e9c 14.0 landed
- 259b21233032 12.6 landed
-
Document concurrent indexes waiting on each other
- ed9c9b033546 11.11 landed
- d3bd36a63d69 10.16 landed
- b3d33bf598dd 9.6.21 landed
- b2603f16ad75 12.6 landed
- 968a537b432e 9.5.25 landed
- 58ebe967f8a1 14.0 landed
- 3fe0e7c3fa27 13.2 landed
-
snapshot scalability: Don't compute global horizons while building snapshots.
- dc7420c2c927 14.0 cited
-
Remove PROC_IN_ANALYZE and derived flags
- cea3d5589865 14.0 landed
-
Improve performance of get_actual_variable_range with recently-dead tuples.
- 3ca930fc39cc 11.0 cited