Re: Internal key management system

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Cary Huang <cary.huang@highgo.ca>, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, "Moon, Insung" <tsukiwamoon.pgsql@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope@jackdb.com>, cary huang <hcary328@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-03-19T16:38:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:50:27AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 0:35 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>     Well, the issue is if the user can control the user key, there is might be
>     a way to make the user key do nothing.
> 
> Well I meant ‘USER_KEY:’ is a fixed length string for the key used for wrap and
> unwrap SQL interface functions. So user cannot control it. We will have another
> key derived by, for example, HKDF(MK, ‘TDE_KEY:’ || system_identifier) for
> block encryption.

OK, yes, something liek that might make sense.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +