Horton

Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target

Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
To: "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)" <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com>, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-03-18T15:53:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:32:19PM +0000, Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan
A&PS Delivery) wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>Thanks for the report. Yes, this is clearly an omission. I think it
>>would be better to use wording >similar to attstattarget, per the
>>attached patch. That is, without reference to ALTER STATISTICS and
>>>better explaination of what positive/negative values do. Do you
>>>agree?
>
>Thank you for your comment.  I agree with the text you suggested.
>

Thank you for the report, I've pushed the reworded fix.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Allow setting statistics target for extended statistics