Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@heterodb.com>, Adam Brightwell <adam.brightwell@crunchydata.com>
Date: 2020-03-17T00:14:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Mar-16, Mark Dilger wrote:

> Hackers,
> 
> While working on object access hooks, I noticed several locations where I would expect the hook to be invoked, but no actual invocation.  I think this just barely qualifies as a bug.  It's debatable because whether it is a bug depends on the user's expectations and whether not invoking the hook in these cases is defensible.  Does anybody have any recollection of an intentional choice not to invoke in these locations?

Hmm, possibly the create-time calls are missing.

I'm surprised about the InvokeObjectDropHook calls though.  Doesn't
deleteOneObject already call that?  If we have more calls elsewhere,
maybe they are redundant.  I think we should only have those for
"shared" objects.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



Commits

  1. Add missing invocations to object access hooks