Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>, Alexey Kondratov <a.kondratov@postgrespro.ru>, Liudmila Mantrova <l.mantrova@postgrespro.ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, vladimirlesk@yandex-team.ru, dsarafan@yandex-team.ru
Date: 2020-03-13T00:18:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Move frontend-side archive APIs from src/common/ to src/fe_utils/
- 8d8b89266ca0 13.0 landed
- a3b2bf1fe7ce 14.0 landed
-
Add -c/--restore-target-wal to pg_rewind
- a7e8ece41cf7 13.0 landed
-
Move routine definitions of xlogarchive.c to a new header file
- 616ae3d2b056 13.0 landed
-
Move routine building restore_command to src/common/
- e09ad07b21a2 13.0 landed
-
Integrate recovery.conf into postgresql.conf
- 2dedf4d9a899 12.0 cited
Attachments
- v3-0001-Move-routine-generating-restore_command-to-src-co.patch (text/x-diff) patch v3-0001
- v3-0002-Add-c-restore-target-wal-to-pg_rewind.patch (text/x-diff) patch v3-0002
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:50:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Thanks, looks good. I don't think we *need* the MAXPGPATH restriction > really -- I was thinking in a StringInfo kind of approach where you just > append the stuff you need without having to think about the buffer > length. Oh, OK. I missed your point then. No problem with that by doing it as the attached. There is one small trick because of make_native_path() though. > Aha, good. I would still put the new "archive.c" entry on its own line, > and just keep the other two lines unchanged. (That preserves the > perhaps non-obvious property that all entries that start with the same > letter are in the same line.) No issues with that either. Are you fine with the updated version attached for 0001? -- Michael