Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>
Cc: daniel@yesql.se, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-03-07T01:09:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 10:09:31AM +0100, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:40 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> LGTM
> 
> +1

Thanks to both of you for the reviews.  Please note that I will
mention the business with pg_ctl and logging in a new  thread and
remove the diff of pg_ctl.c from the previous patch, and that the doc
changes could be backpatched down to 12 for the relevant parts.  The
documentation for PG_COLORS is still missing, but that's not new and I
think that we had better handle that case separately by creating a new
section in the docs.  For now, let's wait a couple of days and see if
others have more thoughts to share about the doc patch of this thread.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Doc: fix some description of environment variables with frontend tools