Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>
Cc: daniel@yesql.se, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-03-07T01:09:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 10:09:31AM +0100, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:40 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: >> LGTM > > +1 Thanks to both of you for the reviews. Please note that I will mention the business with pg_ctl and logging in a new thread and remove the diff of pg_ctl.c from the previous patch, and that the doc changes could be backpatched down to 12 for the relevant parts. The documentation for PG_COLORS is still missing, but that's not new and I think that we had better handle that case separately by creating a new section in the docs. For now, let's wait a couple of days and see if others have more thoughts to share about the doc patch of this thread. -- Michael
Commits
-
Doc: fix some description of environment variables with frontend tools
- 654bd6985df8 12.3 landed
- 5aaa584f819e 13.0 landed