Re: Use compiler intrinsics for bit ops in hash

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:12:24AM +0100, David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 04:59:18PM +0100, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 03:45:12PM -0800, Jesse Zhang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 2:09 PM David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> > > > > The changes in hash AM and SIMPLEHASH do look like a net positive
> > > > > improvement. My biggest cringe might be in pg_bitutils:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Is ceil_log2_64 dead code?
> > > >
> > > > Let's call it nascent code. I suspect there are places it could go, if
> > > > I look for them.  Also, it seemed silly to have one without the other.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > While not absolutely required, I'd like us to find at least one
> > > place and start using it. (Clang also nags at me when we have
> > > unused functions).
> > 
> > Done in the expanded patches attached.
> 
> These bit-rotted a little, so I've updated them.

05d8449e73694585b59f8b03aaa087f04cc4679a broke this patch set, so fix.

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate