Horton

Re: Do not check unlogged indexes on standby

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-02-06T15:59:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2020-Feb-05, Peter Geoghegan wrote:

> The second item genereated another thread a little after this thread.
> Everything was handled on this other thread. Ultimately, I rejected
> the enhancement on the grounds that it wasn't safe on standbys in the
> face of concurrent splits and deletions [1].
> 
> I believe that all of the items discussed on this thread have been
> resolved. Did I miss a CF entry or something?

Nah.  I just had one of the messages flagged in my inbox, and I wasn't
sure what had happened since the other thread was not referenced in this
one.  I wasn't looking at any CF entries.

Thanks for the explanation,

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. amcheck: Skip unlogged relations during recovery.