Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2020-02-06T14:44:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wondered if it wouldn't be better if CLUSTER ON was stored in pg_class as the Oid of a clustered index, rather than a boolean in pg_index. That likely would've avoided (or at least exposed) this issue. And avoids the possibility of having two indices marked as "clustered". These would be more trivial: mark_index_clustered /* We need to find the index that has indisclustered set. */
Commits
-
Refactor cluster.c to use new routine get_index_isclustered()
- 8ef9451f58ee 13.0 landed
-
Preserve clustered index after rewrites with ALTER TABLE
- 3f77a670241d 9.5.22 landed
- 61a161fe4421 9.6.18 landed
- cef2b8d52c59 10.13 landed
- 41faafbd75a5 11.8 landed
- 3e62dd3a937b 12.3 landed
- a40caf5f862c 13.0 landed
-
Preserve replica identity index across ALTER TABLE rewrite
- 1cc9c2412cc9 13.0 cited
-
Remove RangeIOData->typiofunc
- a77315fdf2a1 13.0 cited
-
Preserve pg_index.indisclustered across REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
- f087d63a45b5 12.3 landed
- d79fb88ac738 13.0 landed