Re: A rather hackish POC for alternative implementation of WITH TIES
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2020-01-22T22:06:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello As this is a valuable feature, it would be good to have something happen here. I wouldn't like to have pg13 ship with no implementation of WITH TIES at all. My own inclination is that Andrew's implementation, being more general in nature, would be the better one to have in the codebase; but we don't have a complete patch yet. Can we reach some compromise such as if Andrew's patch is not completed then we push Surafel's? Thanks -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Support FETCH FIRST WITH TIES
- 357889eb17bb 13.0 landed