Re: [Logical Replication] TRAP: FailedAssertion("rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_DEFAULT || rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_FULL || rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX"
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Neha Sharma <neha.sharma@enterprisedb.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-01-09T17:13:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove incorrect assertion for INSERT in logical replication's publisher
- 30104eca8856 10.12 landed
- 7eb6217db9ed 11.7 landed
- 7c21a964ef8a 12.2 landed
- 1088729e84cc 13.0 landed
-
Have logical replication subscriber fire column triggers
- b9c130a1fdf1 13.0 cited
Hi, On 2020-01-09 13:17:59 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote: > I am able to reproduce the failure, I think the assert in the > 'logicalrep_write_insert' is not correct. IMHO even if the replica > identity is set to NOTHING we should be able to replicate INSERT? > > This will fix the issue. > > diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/proto.c > b/src/backend/replication/logical/proto.c > index dcf7c08..471461c 100644 > --- a/src/backend/replication/logical/proto.c > +++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/proto.c > @@ -145,7 +145,8 @@ logicalrep_write_insert(StringInfo out, Relation > rel, HeapTuple newtuple) > > Assert(rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_DEFAULT || > rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_FULL || > - rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX); > + rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX || > + rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_NOTHING); > > /* use Oid as relation identifier */ > pq_sendint32(out, RelationGetRelid(rel)); There's not much point in having this assert, right? Given that it covers all choices? Seems better to just drop it. Greetings, Andres Freund