Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-01-03T22:31:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Jan-03, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 4:11 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Maybe a very simple solution is indeed to have a separate pg_math or > > pg_extra or whatever, which by default is *last* in the search_path. > > That would make a user's gcd() be chosen preferently, if one exists. > > Then every time we add a function, or anything else, we can bikeshed > about whether it should go in pg_catalog or pg_extra! Yeah, I was just thinking about that :-) I was thinking that all standard-mandated functions, as well as system functions, should be in pg_catalog; and otherwise stuff should not get in the user's way. > FWIW, EnterpriseDB has something like this for Advanced Server, and it > actually adds a fair amount of complexity, much of it around > OverrideSearchPath. It's not unmanageable, but it's not trivial, > either. Oh, hmm. okay. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Add functions gcd() and lcm() for integer and numeric types.
- 13661ddd7eae 13.0 landed