Horton

Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-09-07T04:13:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 08:51:36AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Yeah, since I read this message, I was thinking that new patch will be
> posted. But, Josef, if the situation was changed, could you correct me?
> Anyway the patch seems not to be applied cleanly, so at least it needs to
> be updated to address that.

Josef, the patch has been waiting on author for a bit more than one
month, so could you send a rebased version please?  It looks that you
are still a bit confused by the commit fest process, and as a first
step we need a clean version to be able to review it.  This would also
allow the commit fest bot to check it at http://commitfest.cputube.org/.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Report progress of COPY commands

  2. Doc fixup for hashagg_avoid_disk_plan GUC.

  3. Fix inconsistent markups in catalogs.sgml