Re: clarify "rewritten" in pg_checksums docs
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-09-02T08:26:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 03:44:06PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Well, I was thinking less technically accurate and more descriptive for end > users, hiding the implementation details. "Rewrite" sounds to me more like > changing data rather than amending pages with a checksum keeping data intact. > Either way, adding "in-place" is an improvement IMO. Using rewritten still sounds more adapted to me, as we still write the thing with chunks of size BLCKSZ. No objections with the addition of "in-place" for that sentence. Any extra opinions? -- Michael
Commits
-
doc: Tweak sentence for pg_checksums when enabling checksums
- 87483c7bb320 12.5 landed
- b7cf9e42ac2d 13.0 landed
- f0942b1327e8 14.0 landed