Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, osdba <mailtch@163.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Date: 2020-08-25T14:06:25Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:44:03PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:01:00PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Sure, I can wait.  Is this the only place where it would make sense?
> 
> I think so.  If there are other places, it does not prevent improving
> what we already know needs improvement.

Well, my point is that if this area looks different from other places,
it could look odd, so we can't always make incremental fixes to the
docs, though it might be fine in this case.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




Commits

  1. doc: Rework tables for built-in operator classes of index AMs