Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, osdba <mailtch@163.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Date: 2020-08-24T16:01:00Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:59:22AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2020-Aug-24, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I don't think it is worth it, plus we would need to adjust the docs if > > system catalog layout changes. I think we just want something concise > > and simple, but also accurate. > > I argued for \dAo, not straight catalog output -- that was a straw man. > > I can't produce the docbook right now but I volunteer to show a > screenshot for what I propose later this week. Sure, I can wait. Is this the only place where it would make sense? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
Commits
-
doc: Rework tables for built-in operator classes of index AMs
- 7a1cd5260aa2 14.0 landed