Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, osdba <mailtch@163.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Date: 2020-08-24T16:01:00Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:59:22AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Aug-24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > I don't think it is worth it, plus we would need to adjust the docs if
> > system catalog layout changes.  I think we just want something concise
> > and simple, but also accurate.
> 
> I argued for \dAo, not straight catalog output -- that was a straw man.
> 
> I can't produce the docbook right now but I volunteer to show a
> screenshot for what I propose later this week.

Sure, I can wait.  Is this the only place where it would make sense?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




Commits

  1. doc: Rework tables for built-in operator classes of index AMs