Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:19:07PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Now that we can point people to psql's \dAo, do we really need to have
> these tables at all?

Having the tables is IMO still useful as a quick reference for users
that don't have immediately psql at hand when working on an
application, for example imagine somebody using pgAdmin.  And I would
imagine that such people are not few.  Another risk here is somebody
using psql with a server that has a major version different than the
one they are working on, leading to false assumptions?  Having at
least a mention to those psql shortcuts in the docs is still a good
idea IMO, as said upthread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200804055651.GC2091@paquier.xyz
--
Michael