Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

On Mon, Aug  3, 2020 at 04:49:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:14:56PM +0800, osdba wrote:
> > "range_opsany range type&& &> &< >> << <@ -|- = @> @>"， exist double "@>"，
> >  
> > Should be "<@ @>" ?
> 
> Indeed, this needs to be improved.  Another issue on the same page is
> that point_ops lists the same operator three times, <@.  Other index
> pages don't seem to have any inconsistencies, fortunately.

I decided to remove the duplicates and just add "(multiple)" after
operators that have multiple system table entries;  patch attached.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee