Re: please update ps display for recovery checkpoint
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: "k.jamison@fujitsu.com" <k.jamison@fujitsu.com>
Cc: 'Justin Pryzby' <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-08-20T08:09:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 12:20:50AM +0000, k.jamison@fujitsu.com wrote: > On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 7:53 AM (GMT+9), Justin Pryzby wrote: >> During crash recovery, the server writes this to log: >> Please change to say "recovery checkpoint" or similar, as I mentioned here. >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200118201111.GP26045@telsasoft.c >> om > > Yes, I agree that it is helpful to tell users about that. That could be helpful. Wouldn't it be better to use "end-of-recovery checkpoint" instead? That's the common wording in the code comments. I don't see the point of patch 0002. In the same paragraph, we already know that this applies to any checkpoints. > About 0003 patch, there are similar phrases in bgwriter_flush_after and > backend_flush_after. Should those be updated too? Yep, makes sense. -- Michael
Commits
-
Provide recovery_init_sync_method=syncfs.
- 61752afb2640 14.0 cited
-
Add some checkpoint/restartpoint status to ps display
- df9274adf309 14.0 landed