Horton

Re: Dependencies for partitioned indexes are still a mess

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-08-14T21:35:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2020-Aug-14, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> On 2020-Aug-12, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, we do make the FK constraint depend on the ATTACH for the direct
> > children; what I think we're lacking is dependencies on descendants
> > twice-removed (?) or higher.  This mock patch seems to fix this problem
> > by adding dependencies recursively on all children of the index; I no
> > longer see this problem with it.
> 
> After going over this some more, this analysis seems correct.  Here's a
> better version of the patch which seems final to me.

Pushed.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Fix typo in comment

  2. pg_dump: fix dependencies on FKs to partitioned tables